Earmark Reform
Corporations and special interests should not be able to buy favors from Congress. All too often, spending bills passed by Congress put public funds to work for specific projects that reward the businesses and individuals that give the most money to congressional campaigns. These specific appropriations – called earmarks – should be limited to projects that serve the public interest, not doled out to enrich private interests at the public’s expense.
More Resources on Earmark Reform
- Fact Sheet: Five Principles of Earmark Reform (PDF), November 10, 2010
- Proposed Earmark / Pay-to-Play Reform Bill (PDF), November 10, 2010
- Press Release: Bipartisan Coalition of Lobbyists and Advocates Announces Commonsense Earmark Reform Principles, September 28, 2010
- Press Release: Obama Strengthens Restrictions on Lobbying for Earmarks in the Stimulus Package, May 29, 2009
- Opinion Article: " 'Bridges to Nowhere' Are No More," by Craig Holman, Roll Call, January 22, 2008
- Press Release: Public Citizen Urges Congress to Pass Ground-Breaking Package of Lobbyist Fundraising, Earmark and Other Key Reforms, July 30, 2007
- Press Release: Architects of an Earmark: The Story of the RPSEA Rip-Off, January 17, 2007
- Press Release: Congress Can and Should Stop Industry-Sponsored Boondoggles From Being Slipped Into Bills, January 17, 2007
- Press Release: Ney’s Plea Underscores Need for Lobbying Reform, Inadequacy of House of Representatives’ Earmark Disclosure Rules Change, September 15, 2006
- Press Release: House GOP Leaders Apparently Not Serious About Earmark Reform, September 13, 2006
- Letter: GOP Earmark Reform Proposal is Woefully Inadequate (PDF), September 13, 2006